It was on October 29 that I had written about the Tehelka expose on the riots in Gujarat, which showed a number of people on hidden cameras boasting and saying many horrific things about what they had done during the riots which had engulfed Gujarat in 2002. These riots had taken place in reaction to a railway coach full of Hindu pilgrims being burnt, allegedly by Muslim fundamentalists, at Godhra, killing all of them.
I had then asked the question which had been begging to be asked but had been ignored by the politicians and the media: Were the Gujarat riots of 2002 any different from the anti Sikh riots that had engulfed Delhi in 1984 after Indira Gandhi was assassinated, when thousands of Sikhs were lynched, burnt and mercilessly butchered?
Everyone seemed to have conveniently forgotten the shame of 1984, particularly the Congress party, which with the help of its sponsored media friends, was gleefully all set to politically destroy Narendra Modi for his involvement in the riots of
I had expressed my reservations about the success of this strategy and had even gone to the extent of saying that the flame lit by Tehelka, instead of burning Modi, had made him almost invincible in
The full post may be read here.
I had no way of knowing then that within a couple of days, 1984 riots would be back on centre stage with a bang to haunt the Congress and turn the Tehelka table on them decisively.
On
In their program ‘Face the Nation’, the host, Sagarika Ghose had this to say:”
Then she asked almost the same question that I had in my post:” Is the Congress as guilty over the 1984 riots as the BJP in
Ghose spoke to the authors, journalist Manoj Mitta and lawyer HS Phoolka, and the Congress spokesman Abhishek Manu Singhvi and raised very disturbing questions which had Singhvi virtually groping for answers, which were clearly not there.
The lively, disturbing and revealing debate can be viewed and read here.
The mass reaction in
The disconnected leaders and their SWOT analysts who had planned the Tehelka sting had, not surprisingly, not factored in the ordinary man on the street, while planning and executing the expose, which they thought would bring to them great political advantages.
I had said then itself that to the ordinary Indian, you can’t say, “Genocide is fine if my mom is killed; it is heinous if faceless Indians are!”
That answer was given just as I had sensed by citizens to CNN-IBN. In the SMS poll conducted by the channel to the question,” Is the Congress as guilty over the 1984 riots as the BJP in
It may now be the turn of Narendra Modi to laugh at the Congress for a victory it has handed over to him so foolishly. For the ordinary citizen, however, there is no reason to celebrate. No matter who wins, the disturbing fact which has emerged yet again is that our leaders will stop at almost nothing in their desperation to win the next election.
The common man is only an expendable pawn.
2 comments:
Bonjour Vinod,
What happens in the head of people rioting, meaning moving around on a killing and maiming spree?
Are they "half devil and half child" as Kipling's poem said a hundred years ago or what??
Georg
I wonder if it is as simple as "half devil and half child" to explain why frenzied masses spontaneously do what they would normally not even think of doing.
There can be many many
reasons.Incitement by a few certainly plays a major part. But a matchstick can only set fire to an inflammable material, which may appear inert till it is lit.
Post a Comment