There were two disturbing developments last week which should have evoked a major response in the public domain but, not surprisingly, once again those claiming to be championing the cause of secularism lost their voice.
First, Muslim hardliners, after successfully bringing the secular communist government of West Bengal to its knees in the Tasleema Nasreen case, fired another potentially far more explosive salvo at the very secular fabric of the nation. The All India Ulema Association issued a call to all Indian Muslims to boycott all products manufactured by the Godrej Group. Reason: Parmeshwar Godrej had invited author Salman Rushdie to be part of her AIDS initiative. The association also demanded an apology from the lady for hurting the religious sentiments of the Muslim community by playing host to Mr. Rushdie, author of the blasphemous Satanic Verses.
To make matters worse, this call was given pan national respectability and stridency by the powerful Muslim Personal Law Board. Feeble voices of only a handful of secular Muslims of little standing were heard against the boycott call. Yet again, this development did not make the cut as newsworthy in the mainstream television media while it was buried insignificantly in the print media.
On the contrary, the ransacking of the offices of a news channel by communal Hindus protesting against MF Hussein being listed by the channel as a contender for Bharat Ratna in a poll conducted by it was splashed all over. It is worth recalling that MF Hussein had drawn the ire of some Hindu organizations for painting Hindu Goddesses in the nude.
The weakness shown by both the Central and West Bengal governments in allowing fundamentalist Muslims to dictate their agenda has, as it had to, led to this very, very divisive and dangerous call for a nation wide economic boycott only because of an individual’s personal and social relations with someone who had once written something blasphemous.
This is extreme religious intolerance of the worst kind. It is no different in spirit from the Talibani type of intolerance and is as loud a rejection of the idea of a secular multi-religious society as it can get. If not dealt with firmly and checked without delay, the walk from a boycott to a Kalashnikov will be short and seamless and sudden.
The other development was the seemingly innocuous decision of the
Who gave
It is indeed surprising that the government of
The increasing intolerance of radical and mainstream Muslim organizations coupled with their silence on the efforts of
These two developments of the last week need to be viewed holistically in the context of the religious intolerance which has already morphed dangerously into terrorism only because it was not analyzed and checked in time by those who are now suffering from it. If things continue this way, then, as I have written earlier too, be prepared for a communal bloodbath that will be much worse and far more widespread than the massacres that took place in 1947. No one with any sense wants that. But when passions consume sense, anything can happen, as history has shown again and again.
We have a responsibility, I think, to leave behind a better, safer
No comments:
Post a Comment